I noticed I write more about metaphysics than physics. I have done so perhaps because metaphysical questions are more relevant to our lives today than abstract questions of modern physics; also because I am much more certain, in fact absolutely certain, of the metaphysical order and its eternal truths than the physical order and its facts. But during decades of working with both disciplines I have come to understand the physical order as an imperfect reflection of the metaphysical order, the mathematical laws of physics as temporal reflections of eternal truths of metaphysics. It cannot be otherwise, for there is only one truth and one fact. The truth is the One, and the fact is the fallen one, man. If man is the fallen spirit, then fact is the fallen truth, physics the fallen metaphysics, and reason the fallen intellect.
The irony of the situation is that after all these years in both fronts I have arrived at one and the same question: “How does the one become the many?”
In the context of metaphysics, I know from direct perception the unity and unicity of the Real, the nondual substance of totality which is beyond being and non-being. I also know the apparent diversity of the phenomena world, that we live in an apparently changing universe. Thus, there is a truth and a fact: The truth is that there is nothing but the One; the fact is that there is an experience of multiplicity. The question is how does that truth appear as this fact? How does the nondual, immutable One at once appear as the changing? I call this the enigma of all enigmas. No doubt the One never really becomes the many; the difference is only apparent, each belonging to different order of reality. But metaphysics is metaphysics and must ground metaphysical questions.
In the context of physics, we know that though there appears to be an infinite number of particles in the universe, their behavior is as if there were only one particle, a scenario called the One Electron Universe by John Wheeler. The question arises: How can one electron appear as the many at once being at many places? This question is the focus of my academic research as a physicist and I call it the quantum enigma.
Seeing that there is one question at the bottom of both quests I felt that insight into one may lead to insight into another. I am much more clear about the metaphysical aspect of the question but like to know its bearing on the physical plane.
For these reasons I feel I need to write something in the area of my expertise, quantum physics, in a simplified language which may interest others as it interests me; the goal is to see the astonishing similarities between the world of the mystic and the world of the modern physics. I will do so in the upcoming post(s).
5 thoughts on “Physics & Metaphysics”
Am looking forward to reading your upcoming posts regarding the similarities between mysticism and physics. Mysticism is self-evident to me. I am beginning to follow, as a lay person, all that I can read & understand about the new physics in terms of ‘corroborating evidence’ of the metaphysical…partly for the ‘fun’ involved & to compare to the ancient Vedic texts & some more ‘modern’ texts, such as The Gospel of Thomas to the view of physics. This is an interesting ‘ride’. Thanks for sharing your own thoughts on these subjects.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Wonderful!! Looking forward to it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You read my post on thought being the active ingredient that creates a material record of the universe. I obviously think this is a big part of the question you ask here. The vibrational nature of matter makes it easy to visualize the world as a cosmic recording that changes locally. This has such vast implications that I am stunned with the realization. I am season without words, but this realization shocks me in that even lives relived is possible in infinity, except for the realization that it was not substantial even on the first time around! I see we will be bouncing off one another for quite some time in the future.
For your readers, the link is http://heliosliterature.com/2015/02/12/thought/
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have no idea what I said above. Something went askew. What I was trying to relate is that the vibrational states compose matter in the wave forms are basically like digital recordings. They encode information into chemical elements. They are read by the ‘laser’ of thought and organized into chemical compounds and organic structures. In this manner, events are recorded and strung together in strands to become experience. It is this experience that makes our world, local and universal.
My own view is that it is all consciousness, or thought, that vibrates and appears as both the world and the observer. I don’t see anything other than thought existing. Even the constructs of modern physics are constructs of thoughts. But as you best put it it is exactly like music. Experience is a symphony.